George’s war on whinging: part 1

In this special two-part feature, George Megalogenis talks to Michael Sweet about his work and what led a ‘nervy kid’ from Richmond to where he is today


Arguably the most influential Greek Australian journalist of his or any other generation, George Megalogenis is a hugely important voice that carries to the most powerful corners of the nation’s political landscape.
His new book The Australian Moment is a manifesto on why Australia is uniquely positioned to make the most of this ‘Asian Century’, and why those who talk down Australia’s achievements and potential are in need of a serious reality check.
It doesn’t take long for George Megalogenis to get into his stride, either literally or figuratively as we make our way to the ground-floor cafe of the Herald Weekly Tower in Southbank where this most respected of political journalists plies his trade.
Megalogenis occupies a position unique in the Australian media: a ‘small L’ liberal voice in a national broadsheet that is better known for its conservative tendencies.
Not many authors get a sitting Prime Minister to launch their latest book. When Julia Gillard spoke at the launch of The Australian Moment – in which he dissects 40 years of reforms which he says have made Australia the world’s last best hope as a country – the PM enthusiastically supported the author’s argument that Australia is not simply a lucky country, but is extremely good at managing its affairs.
Unsurprisingly the PM was rather less happy about Megalogenis’ line that the last serious election in Australia was in 1993 and that political leadership in Australia is at one of its lowest ebbs. But then that’s very Megalogenis.
How he sits so comfortably on the high-wire of the political divide, eschewing partisanship, articulately delivering his opinions on the most vital issues facing the country today, is key to the immense respect his readers have for him.
Being The Australian newspaper’s resident nit-picker is the other part of that equation.
Megalogenis’ hallmark as a political journalist is a meticulous attention to explaining data – an almost forensic obsession for facts and figures to support his observations.
For George Megalogenis the devil may be in the detail, but so is the truth. In a wide-ranging interview, we began at the beginning.
Tell me about growing up in Melbourne in the 1970s. You’ve described yourself as “ridicule’s first recruit” in those days. What happened to make you feel that way?
In 1972 I’d moved schools, this was after year 3. I’d been a pretty contented kid up until that point – and then I started getting into trouble. I got picked on and I didn’t know how to deal with it.
I was carrying a sign around my neck saying ‘I was a vulnerable young kid, if you want to have a crack, I won’t know how to deal with it.’
The wog thing was clearly part of it, and you had to think your way out of that. You could either continue to get beaten up [laughs], or you could just get on with life.”
Were you aware of changes in Australian society at the time?
“In the second half of the 1970s the first boat people were arriving and were attracting a lot of attention in the media. I was aware of that as I hit my teens.
In my research for The Australian Moment I looked back at the polling in the 1970s and discovered Greeks were no more popular after the arrival of the Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees. Anti-migration sentiment in the late 70s was a strong as it was in the 50s. So I was conscious of another outcast.”
A hallmark of your journalism is a meticulous analysis of data. Was that attention to detail in your psychological make up from an early age?
“I used to have this strange facility with numbers, so I could recall for instance, in sequence, every run I’d scored batting in cricket for the Saturday morning club side I played for in North Caulfield. This would work until about I was about 80 not out, but when I got to 90 or so I lost track.”
What did you want to be when you were a child?
I wanted to be a policeman at first, then I wanted to be a football player. Growing up in Richmond my mother had needed to give me a social tool and she gave me the footy team. [Megalogenis has been a committed Tigers fan ever since].
“At some point in my middle teens it occurred to me I wanted to be a journalist and I didn’t let go of that thought.
In those days I remember Neos Kosmos being in the house, alongside the Melbourne Sun and the Melbourne Herald. There was always a newspaper on the kitchen table. Maybe that’s one of the reasons I ended up in newspapers.”
Can you remember the first time you became consciously aware of a political event or personality?
“My parents weren’t really political, but by 1972 Gough Whitlam was the buzz. There had been a change of government after 23 years. Even as a young kid you couldn’t help but notice.
I was eight and I remember Gough coming to power in the ’72 election. One memory I have is from 1975 – Liberal kids teasing the Labor kids on the day of the Dismissal – November 11. Of course I wasn’t involved. It was one of those fights I could stay out of, because it wasn’t about me.
I was always a very nervy kid. Every time I had to stand up in class I’d get a dizzy spell. This would happen in primary and early high school. I went to Melbourne High in 1978 and I thought the first thing I need to do is to get into debating to cure this thing, otherwise it’s going to stay with me and I found debating was fun.”
After highschool Megalogenis attended Melbourne University graduating with a degree in Economics and Politics – which he describes as “a means to an end” – the goal always being journalism.
What was your first story with a byline?
“I got a graduate cadetship with the Sun News Pictorial in 1986 and I remember my first byline was for a story on the footballer Gary Ablett senior. For the first few months it was general reporting, followed by six months of caption-writing on the night desk and then three months of police rounds. At the start of 1987 as a D grade journalist I was sent to state parliament as a junior reporter.”
How did it feel to be part of the press gallery in Canberra as a young journalist – being so close to the machine? What did that experience give you?
“I’m 24 years-old, the first in my family to have completed tertiary education on either mum or dad’s side, and I’m propelled into this ‘thing’ called federal parliament.
The beauty of Australia is how close you can get to power. You don’t have to be an insider to get access, it’s an informal democracy. I was very lucky to turn up when public policy still mattered. The entire Australian model was up for negotiation.
As a 24-year-old with an economics background, writing for News Limited, the first minister I got to know on my beat was Paul Keating, the PM was Bob Hawke, the shadow minister was John Hewson and the opposition leader was John Howard. It wasn’t a bad quartet for a working journalist to start out with.”
In the Canberra press gallery between 1989 and 1999 is there one story that stands out for you above all others?
“In that period a lot of the policy was very important. I’m still writing about it to this day. The single biggest event during that time, which rocked the entire nation, was the leadership challenge between Keating and Hawke. It was a winter’s night, the end of May 1991, and I remember being in Parliament until 4 or 5am. It was the single most dramatic event of my professional life.
In The Australian Moment you spoke with five Prime Ministers about how over 40 years, smart reforms made Australia ‘the last rich nation standing in the 21st Century’. Who brought about the most critical reforms?
“The Hawke-Keating partnership was the most significant. The facilitator was Hawke but the ideas man was Keating, and in a funny way it was Keating that predicted the opportunity for Australia in the 21st Century.
This is not a partisan observation – I sit on the fence politically – but if you think about Australia today and what might lift it out of its present mediocrity at a leadership level, it would be a strong voice like that, who wasn’t afraid of people – who was open to immigration, who wasn’t afraid of markets and who was pro-competition.”
Part 2 of ‘George’s war on whinging’ continues in the next Saturday edition of Neos Kosmos.