In the conscious re-casting of the Greek identity so as to conform to Western stereotypes and conceptions, the city of Constantinople—a true successor to the multi-ethnic and multicultural Hellenistic kingdoms, which for over a thousand years moulded and shaped Greek cultural identity and is a vital link of continuity between the ancient and modern worlds, a valuable repository and disseminator of world civilisation—is largely overlooked, except within the hypernationalistic circles of the fringe dwellers of our ever unravelling intellectual carpet. Its fall, a traumatic event, altered the course of history.

The Last Emperor and the siege of civilisation

In the final years leading up to the decline and eventual fall of Constantinople, the last Emperor was Constantine XI, who inherited a remnant of an empire of past glories, surrounded by Ottoman Turks. Despite his efforts to secure military aid through religious union with Rome, the West failed to send help. Constantine was left to rule over a deserted city defended only by five thousand citizens and a modest band of Genoese mercenaries.

Turkish Sultan Mehmet II, meanwhile, meticulously prepared for siege. Controlling trade routes, erecting fortifications, and—with Hungarian assistance—constructing the largest cannon the world had yet seen, Mehmet laid siege to Constantinople in April 1453. For 54 days, the Ottomans bombarded the city by land and sea. At last, a breach was opened in the wall. Constantine, alongside his Varangian Guard, rushed to the gap and fought to the death. His body was never recovered.

Following the city’s fall, Mehmet allowed his troops three days of plunder. The slaughter was indiscriminate. Priests, monks, women and children were butchered in sanctuaries. Mehmet entered Agia Sophia on horseback, trampling the dead. Even he, stunned by the devastation, murmured a Persian couplet in grief: “The spider weaves the curtains in the palace of the Kings, the owl calls the watches in the towers of Afrasiab.”

Mehmet II the Conqueror (15th century), taking the time to smell the roses after the Fall of Constantinople, Museum of Istanbul. Photo: Depositphotos

A memory repressed, a history diminished

It is high time that attention was drawn to this significant but oft-neglected event in the Greek calendar. For reasons still unclear, modern Greeks tend to lionise their ancient past and their post-1821 resurgence, while brushing aside the thousand-year arc of Byzantium—an era in which Greek civilisation reached remarkable cultural, political, and economic heights.

May 29, 1453, the day Constantinople fell, is barely marked, yet its drama and sacrifice surpass even that of Thermopylae. The chronicles are fit for cinema, yet they languish untold. And unlike abstract myth, the trauma of the City’s fall shaped the collective Greek psyche. It marked the first time in two millennia that Greeks stood alone—not rulers within an empire, not subjects of one, but a people bereft and besieged.

Gennadios Scholarios, the first Orthodox Patriarch after the Fall, captured this lament in an elegy: “O City… even stripped in all respects of your celebrated wealth, you were free… You gave those who dwelled within you the nourishment of Christ abundantly… You cannot explain to those who did not see you even once… I will now abandon the task of trying to explain your splendour, because it is impossible.”

The City as vision: Prophecy, ideology, and the Megali Idea

The fall of Constantinople, paradoxically, became a unifier. Despite regional identities, all Greeks looked to the City as a spiritual homeland. Its memory nurtured the hope of a restored empire—The Megali Idea—across centuries of foreign occupation. Catherine the Great dangled the promise of Constantinople to incite Greek revolts. Rhigas Pheraios envisioned it as the capital of a new Orthodox commonwealth, governed by Enlightenment ideals.

Ioannis Kolettis, later Greek Prime Minister, formalised this longing in his political program—the Μεγάλη Ιδέα—a revivalist dream of reconquering Byzantine lands. Fueled by popular myths and prophetic visions, including those of Agathangelos and St. Kosmas the Aetolian, Constantinople became the totem of resistance and destiny.

This eschatological myth shaped Greek foreign policy well into the 20th century—from Thessaly’s invasion in 1897 to the Balkan Wars and, tragically, the Asia Minor Catastrophe of 1922. Though the Megali Idea is now buried, Constantinople continues to represent a spiritual axis—a city more symbolic than any earthly capital.

Constantine, from whom Constantinople derives its name, with his wife and empress, Flavia Maxima Fausta Augusta – between them is Jesus Christ – the Pantocrator (11th century), Agia Sofia, Constantinople (Istanbul). Photo: Depositphotos

Constantinople: End and beginning

If Athens is the political heart of Greece, Constantinople is its soul. And yet, aside from the Church, few commemorate its fall. May 29th is a date of silence, of half-memory—our Alesia. It marked the beginning of Hellenism’s erasure in Anatolia. From a community of half a million in 1922, the Greek population of Constantinople now stands at a mere 3,000—elderly, marginalised, and fearful.

And yet, the City’s legacy is undeniable. Its scholars, fleeing West with manuscripts and ideas, seeded the European Renaissance and rekindled interest in Greek thought. Until the 1930s, more Greek books were published in Constantinople than in Athens. As the personification of Hellenic cultural refinement, the City continues to shine as a beacon.

Perhaps this is why Kostis Palamas’ immortal lines still resonate—expressing not only despair but the promise of rebirth:

«και μην έχοντας πιο κάτου άλλο σκαλί

να κατρακυλήσεις πιο βαθιά στου Κακού τη σκάλα,

για τ’ ανέβασμα ξανά που σε καλεί

θα αιστανθείς να σου φυτρώσουν, ω χαρά!

Τα φτερά, τα φτερά τα πρωτινά σου τα μεγάλα!»

ΑΙΩΝΙΑ Η ΜΝΗΜΗ.