The future of Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese is under renewed scrutiny, as speculation mounts about the potential for Treasurer Jim Chalmers to take the helm of the Labor Party and the country. Prominent commentator and author Niki Savva sparked the conversation in an opinion piece for The Age, suggesting that even if Albanese secures re-election, he should step aside to allow the Labor Party to “regenerate.”
Savva argued that Albanese’s successes—leading Labor to victory and becoming Prime Minister—were remarkable but warned that his tenure risks stagnation. She posited that after a respectful period following re-election, Albanese should make way for new leadership.
“Albanese has achieved more than he or his supporters could have imagined,” wrote Savva.
“He should count his blessings and then gracefully resign, allowing the party to renew itself.”
Her article also raised concerns within the Labor Party about Albanese’s leadership, with whispers that he has lost his political momentum. Some have even called for his replacement before the next election, to strengthen Labor’s position against Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.
“If Albanese loses, a political bloodbath will follow,” she wrote, adding that his legacy could be irreparably damaged if the Coalition triumphs.
The discussion surrounding Chalmers as a potential successor gained traction when he recently presented the Australian Political Book of the Year Award. During the event, bookstore owner Duncan Johnston introduced him as a possible future prime minister, a comment met with knowing smiles and nods from attendees.
While Chalmers diplomatically dismissed the speculation in interviews with Patricia Karvelas on ABC RN Breakfast and Seven’s Spotlight, he acknowledged the importance of stability within Labor under Albanese’s leadership.
“My expectation and hope are that, if we win the next election, Anthony Albanese will serve a full term and run again,” Chalmers said. “I foresee myself continuing as Treasurer, focusing on helping Australians during difficult times.”
On a similar note, journalist George Megalogenis, writing in Quarterly Essay, echoed concerns about Albanese’s leadership style, describing it as lacking the “poetry of his predecessors.” His criticism highlighted the prime minister’s uninspired rhetoric and outdated ideas.
Savva cited Megalogenis in her article, stressing that Albanese’s decision-making has eroded public trust and squandered valuable time.
With Dutton positioned as an electable threat, Albanese faces mounting pressure to deliver a flawless campaign and a bold agenda.
While Chalmers has consistently reiterated his support for Albanese, he remains a central figure in discussions about Labor’s long-term leadership. His ability to connect with voters and project economic competence has made him a popular choice within the party’s ranks.
